Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer

Reuters
December 21, 2007

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Airport security lines can annoy passengers, but there is no evidence that they make flying any safer, U.S. researchers reported on Thursday.

A team at the Harvard School of Public Health could not find any studies showing whether the time-consuming process of X-raying carry-on luggage prevents hijackings or attacks.

They also found no evidence to suggest that making passengers take off their shoes and confiscating small items prevented any incidents.

The U.S. Transportation Security Administration told research teams requesting information their need for quick new security measures trumped the usefulness of evaluating them, Eleni Linos, Elizabeth Linos, and Graham Colditz reported in the British Medical Journal.

“We noticed that new airport screening protocols were implemented immediately after news reports of terror threats,” they wrote.

“Even without clear evidence of the accuracy of testing, the Transportation Security Administration defended its measures by reporting that more than 13 million prohibited items were intercepted in one year,” the researchers added. “Most of these illegal items were lighters.”

The researchers said it would be interesting to apply medical standards to airport security. Screening programs for illnesses like cancer are usually not broadly instituted unless they have been shown to work.

“We’d like airport security screening to be of value. As passengers and members of the public we’d like to know the evidence and the reasoning behind these measures,” Linos said in a telephone interview.

“Can you hide anything in your shoes that you cannot hide in your underwear?” they asked.

TSA spokesman Christopher White said the agency has not had a chance to read the article.

“If anyone has questions about whether our efforts have been fruitful over the past five years — come on,” White said in a telephone interview.

“While we can’t publicize everything that we’ve done, every event, we can say definitively that our efforts over the last five years have not been for nothing,” White added.

With $5.6 billion spent globally on airport protection each year, the public should be encouraged to query some screening requirements — such as forcing passengers to remove their shoes, the researchers said.

White said the agency has pictures of shoe bombs on its Web site at (www.tsa.gov/) and welcomes people to examine them. “We encourage a legitimate public dialogue. We want passengers to understand why we do what we do,” he said.

Sphere: Related Content

del.icio.us:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer digg:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer spurl:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer wists:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer simpy:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer newsvine:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer blinklist:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer furl:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer reddit:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer fark:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer blogmarks:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer Y!:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer smarking:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer magnolia:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer segnalo:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer gifttagging:Converting Airports to Gestapo Zones Does Not Make Flying Safer
  1. S. Wolf Britain on December 22nd, 2007

    Yah, “….And if you ‘query’ the data from those government agency websites, ‘we’re’ keeping track of all of your queries; and very soon, if you keep questioning ‘what we do’, you better look out, because we’ll end up coming after you!” That’s why they “want (people) to understand (for now) why (they) do what (they) do”. But, as with the closing down of freedom and the rise of fascism elsewhere, every time throughout history, they will very soon close it down and outlaw ALL dissenting voices.

  2. Mark on December 22nd, 2007

    Okay, so the TSA spokesman says go to the TSA website and see all the shoe bombs that we’ve found - I went, and after rummaging the site for half an hour, I didn’t find evidence that they’ve even found one shoe bomb (since that incident with the retard who tried to light his shoe years ago).

    Mostly, TSA is patting themselves on the back when they confiscate “illegal” items. Obviously, with the hundreds of millions of screenings a year, they did find some weapons - occasionally someone forgets what they are carrying. However, as far as I could determine in every case where a weapon was discovered, the owner was cited, but sometimes arrested and then cited for carrying a prohibited item. Obviously, no one - even on the TSA staff or the police officers involved believed any of these packing passengers were a real terrorist threat to anyone.

    My conclusion? The screening at airports is a huge costly boondoggle that secures nothing, does nothing productive, and is a total waste of time.

  3. Jeff on December 22nd, 2007

    It’s easy for the government to state they have intercepted x amount of illegal items when they can declare anything illegal.
    What’s next? Will they declare striped neckties illegal and then crow about how they confiscated 25 million of them and declare it a big triumph for national security?

  4. ihnwlkpzj vofqdxe on April 28th, 2008

    fdzr rutf krdq yija izmqbtfo hboayqj pdura

  5. free plane ticket on July 11th, 2008
  6. buy clozaril on July 21st, 2008

    kcvejdu xzipy otjecdg
    http://www.gratisweb.com/efftreatment/clozaril clozaril protocol

  7. keppra dilantin on July 22nd, 2008

    gkhjp
    http://efftreatment9.warp0.com/keppra2 keppra side effects

  8. manfacturer lopressor on July 25th, 2008

    wnhs
    http://medlem.spray.se/certifi.....pressorwww lopressor,digoxin interaction

  9. side effects of benicar on July 26th, 2008

    ajel kuhn jumbnfr
    http://tabsmap.d0m.us/benicar-cheap-prices.html benicar protocol

  10. buy emsam on September 27th, 2008

    aiynev rifexw ljohm
    http://emsamm.hi5.com buy emsam