Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards

Kurt Nimmo
Truth News
January 1, 2007

I can’t believe I actually made the mistake of voting for this guy. But then, all of us are entitled to a mistake or two.

From Politico: “Ralph Nader unleashed on Hillary Rodham Clinton Monday — criticizing her for being soft on defense spending and a chum of big business — and expressed his strong support for John Edwards.”

That is, for the CFR’s candidate, as Edwards is their darling. I don’t know if Nader is unaware of this. No, he is really too smart to be that brain dead. Obviously, Ralph Nader is a shill for the New World Order. It figures.

In an 11th hour effort to encourage liberal Iowans to “recognize” Edwards by “giving him a victory,” the activist and former presidential contender said in an interview that Clinton will “pander to corporate interest groups” if elected.

Nader specifically accused Clinton of failing to challenge military spending because “she is a woman who doesn’t want to be labeled as soft on defense and she doesn’t want to be shown as taking on big business.”

Sure, Ralph. And Edwards will dismantle the military-intelligence network and send the corporate death merchants a-running for shelter.

And there is a bridge in Brooklyn and it is for sale, too.

Nader, a four-time presidential candidate, called Edwards a Democratic “glimmer of hope.” He has long criticized Democrats as indistinguishable from Republicans, chiding both parties as slaves to corporate financing and interests.

It was Nader who famously — or infamously to many Democrats — siphoned off enough liberal votes from Al Gore in 2000 to hand New Hampshire and Florida, and as a result, the presidency, to George W. Bush. Since 2004, however, Nader has been increasingly controversial within the political left. He was booed at a national conference of progressives earlier this year.

Is the CFR a “glimmer of hope”?

It is if you are a fan of one-world government, as Nader apparently is. Does Ralph believe the machinations of the Rockefeller Foundation and Carnegie Foundation are in the best interest of the American people?

“The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, and which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established,” explained the late CFR historian Carroll Quigley, who served as Bill Clinton’s mentor. “The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common — they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States. A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government,” declared Rear Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR.

But let’s be fair — John Edwards is not a member of the CFR. He only hangs out with them. Earlier this year he delivered a speech to the CFR faithful and warmed the cockles of their hearts. He co-chaired a CFR task force with Jack Kemp. John Edwards is a consummate insider and he will deliver our sovereignty to the globalists on a silver platter.

So will Ralph Nader.

Sphere: Related Content

del.icio.us:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards digg:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards spurl:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards wists:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards simpy:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards newsvine:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards blinklist:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards furl:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards reddit:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards fark:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards blogmarks:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards Y!:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards smarking:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards magnolia:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards segnalo:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards gifttagging:Nader Shills for One-Worlder Edwards
  1. aura on January 1st, 2008

    Ralph Nader is entitled to his opinion, and he’s a greater patriot than many of us will ever be. You seem to be of the opinion that anyone who disagrees with you is all wrong. Nader knows what he is doing and I trust him. However, I’m voting for Ron Paul.

  2. S. Wolf Britain on January 1st, 2008

    It just goes to show that Nader was a left-gatekeeper all along, sold out to the globalists behind the scenes, neither of which am I surprised about at all. I never did totally trust Nader, even though he talked a good talk about some things. In the end I knew that he was probably sold out too, taking endowment money, using the Leftists to promote his, and his string-pullers, political agenda, while making it look, as so much of the Left does, like they’re supposedly standing for some good and right things. It also goes to show what I’ve long said, that we shouldn’t put our trust in humankind, because the usual so-called “crusaders” who don’t give glory to God, will let us down every time.

    But, as far as the claim that Nader supposedly handed Bush the 2000 election, what a bunch of bull! As those of us who know the truth now realize, it didn’t matter in the least how many votes Nader supposedly “siphoned off”, Florida’s votes were stolen and/or disenfranchised, and the Supremes completely unConstitutional decision to not allow the recount of Florida to continue, which would have shown Gore won Florida, therefore the Electoral College, and the Presidency, and all of that is what handed Bush the so-called “win”. Little or nothing Nader did had anything to do with it. The NWO globalists wanted their dictator in, and that’s who they manipulated to get in. Only a NeoCON “(Black) House” would much more quickly destroy all Constitutional freedoms and protection(s) from tyranny, and bring down the republic; and, evidently, globalist Gore was thought too “soft” to put the final nails in the coffin of the destruction of the United States.

    Besides, the NWO manipulators had other plans for Gore, to use him to shill the globalist “climate control” scam and carpetbagger boondoggle of the “climate tax” scheme, which he has done an excellent job of doing, and of fooling most of the world to fall for, or at least most easily manipulated and deceived “Americans” after decades of indoctrination and conditioning has prepared them to be, and corralled them into being, so easily bamboozled over and over again. This is why most of them will swallow hook, line and sinker the entire one-world government, one-world religion agenda, and believe that the Luciferian globalists’ man, the anti-Christ, is supposedly really Jesus, very soon.

  3. Roid on January 1st, 2008

    Aura, if you are a reader of this site, then you know how the game is played. The mere fact that Nader endorses a robotic puppet lackey like Gore completely negates any good he has done for the American people. Anyone involved with the CFR oozes corruption and for Nader to support Gore is completely hypocritical.

  4. Daniel on January 1st, 2008

    Read the Rockefeller file (1976) and you’ll find that Nader has been involved with elites for quite some time. We read,

    “Among the groups financing the Caped Crusader are the ubiquitous Ford Foundation and the Field Foundation, both CFR interlocked. Nader is not really fighting the Establishment. He works for it. According to a Business Week article reprinted in the Congressional Record of March 10, 1971, John D. Rockefeller IV is even an advisor to Nader.”

  5. Darth Chaos on January 1st, 2008

    Daniel, the groups Nader founded in the 1960s especially Public Citizen and the Center for the Study of Responsive Law, were started up by Rockefeller “contributions”. Even the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), the fake “food police” (more like food poisoners), was started up by three ex-CSRI employees (Michael Jacobson and two others), and guess who has funded CSPI from the get-go? The Rockefeller Foundation.

    I am so sick and tired of these Rockefeller “liberals” helping to create problems so they can pose as our fake “saviors” who tell us to give up our liberties. I guess soon we’ll be called al-Qaeda if we speak out against the “fat tax” (which, by the way, has nothing to do with fat, but everything to do with the REAL ID cashless society control grid).

    Ralph Nader and Michael Jacobson, you are not liberals. You are scum. You are pukes. You are the lowest form of life on Earth. You’re not even human f*cking beings. You are nothing more than unorganizaed grabasstic pieces of amphibian sh*t.

  6. Doug on January 1st, 2008

    The Neo-Cons will not win!

  7. Bob Cowley on January 1st, 2008

    Very odd. It appears that not only do a large amount of people have no idea how to assess Ralph Nader, or know so very little about him- but they think they understand the subtle dynamics of networks like CFR membership and the rest. To suggest that Nader is a ’shill’ for the global elites to destroy America’s sovereignty is beyond paranoid… it is beyond delusional.

    Now I was lecturing on issues 30 years ago, that internet ‘researchers’ think they just discovered, concerning the evolution of financial capitalism and its corruption, the agenda of eugenics, one world gov’t, etc. So do NOT think my defense of Ralph is a misguided opinion. I just felt it important for me to purport these comments in an attempt to possibly wake people up from the very NARROW and INACCURATE analysis of much of the politics, that this issue touches upon.

    Let me suggest to the majority of people quick to make all the “links”, that they go beyond the analysis of a few web sites. It is true that many of the conclusions people have come to, regarding the agenda(s) of the global elite ( and the not so global), are ’spot on’… but just because you can identify the color of an automobile does NOT mean one can then rebuild an engine. Real research is not much fun, and is very time consuming… historical, archival, documentary analysis has been set aside for hasty generalizations and misguided focus, perpetuated by online mass hysteria.

    This has ALWAYS been the case… the people who are speaking truth to power often become lost due to the desire to go beyond what they truly understand. Hope some people take this to heart, and do some real THINKING before making conclusions- sometimes there are NO conclusions.. only a vague picture. GOOD LUCK!

  8. Jim on January 1st, 2008

    Nice article, Kurt. But why not mention that Edwards attended Bilderberg? And why not point out that he voted for the Iraq War, knowing darn well that it was a fraud since the neocons explained the real reasons why they wanted to invade Iraq in “The Grand Chessboard” and “Rebuilding America’s Defenses.”

    And why not point out that Edwards supports all of that corporate welfare that Nader rails against? Edwards is just as much of a warhawk corporatist dirtbag as Shillary, no?

  9. truthgonewild on January 1st, 2008

    Jim,

    When you write your own articles, you can talk about every single aspect of Edwards’ life with a fine tooth comb. Till then…

  10. aura on January 1st, 2008

    Hi Roid,

    FYI, Nader never supported Gore. In fact he despises Gore. He ran against him and that’s one of the reason why Gore lost his presidential bid in 2000. Also, I couldn’t disagree with Kurt more about Nader. Nader was warning democrats against the duopoly before anyone else in mainstream politics. He is a man of principles and he would have made a great president. By accusing Nader of being a shill simply because he endorses a certain candidate is to call one own credibility into question. Its an inaccurate and childish slam.

  11. S. Wolf Britain on January 2nd, 2008

    Aura, I believe Roid meant Edwards when he used Gore’s name, and you should have been able to at least figure THAT out. Because evidently you can’t figure much else out since you ignore Nader’s CFR/Rockefeller connections. I guess you don’t think the Rockefellers and the CFR are evil. Figures. In the fantasy world where you and your kind come from, there is no looking behind things, finding the very real evil connections that are really there, and facing all of the pieces of the puzzle; but, instead, your ilk takes and accepts things at face value, refuses to even look at proof of connections with evil, such that you can “blissfully” support and defend deceivers working for deceivers, like Nader working for the CFR and the Rockefellers. Don’t you realize that makes you complicit in the evil?! No, of course not, you and your kind would rather go on living in the false, (self-)deceived so-called “bliss” of your fantasy world where evil sellout betrayers like Nader are supposedly “heroes”!! Well, wake the hell up, come completely out of your fantasy world, look into things much deeper, and don’t EVER trust or take things at face value; otherwise, you are talking out of your heinie and don’t have enough (true) information to make the (kinds of) statements you make.

  12. […] read more | digg story […]

  13. C on January 2nd, 2008

    “By accusing Nader of being a shill simply because he endorses a certain candidate is to call one own credibility into question.”

    Nope. Now is the time. If you’re not standing up right now for Ron Paul, you’re a shill. End of story.

  14. Rabid UK on January 2nd, 2008

    I’m shocked at this revelation, his earlier interview with Chris Matthews on Hardball appeared to suggest he was enthusiastic towards Gravel, Kucinich and Ron Paul!

    I’ve admired Nader for a while, but any entanglements with CFR and the globalist agenda is a definite no. Disappointing.

  15. Libertas on January 2nd, 2008

    It is this simple for all the Nader apologist here. If this man was so great and against what we all loathe, then why would he back John Edwards over Ron Paul, Kucinich, and/or Gravel? He doesn’t and that is because Nader is now bought by someone. He may have done a lot of good work in the past, but the good shepherd does not sharpen his knives in front of the sheep. For people supposedly woken up to the New World Order you sure have a hard time letting certain ones go when they defy your own beliefs. If not go vote for Edwards and be happy.

  16. volum on January 2nd, 2008

    You guys are pathetic.

    Anyone who dismisses others as “gate keepers” when they don’t follow in line with their twisted conspiracy theories, are so retarded it’s beyond me.

    You people and Alex Jones should get in a car with the Loose Change crew and drive it into a lake.

  17. Brenda on January 2nd, 2008

    Or then again the lake might not be for the Alex Jones and Loose Change supporters\crew but maybe the lake is there for some others instead??

  18. andrew on January 2nd, 2008

    nader isnt a gatekeeper. cmon. they kick him out of debates!
    he just doesnt read the same blogs that you do, and doesnt have this fear of CFR or one world government like you do. edwards is actually one of the better democrats as far as i can tell.
    anyway stop talking about nader or edwards. r. paul is our man we all know that.
    and all of these people will be better then what we have now.

  19. Skip Mize on January 2nd, 2008

    I’m voting for Ron Paul in Michigan’s primary only because Edwards, Biden, Richardson, and Obama removed their names from the democratic ballot due to us moving up our primary and they not wanting to piss off the DNC.
    However, I am a HUGE John Edwards fan.
    If he wins the democratic nomination, I will vote for him!!!!

  20. Skip Mize on January 2nd, 2008

    ALL OF US SCREWED UP BACK IN 1992! WE SHOULD HAVE VOTED ROSS PEROT INTO THE WHITE HOUSE! HE, AND ONLY, HE TOLD US THAT NAFTA WAS A BIG CROCK OF COW DUNG!
    ROSS WAS RIGHT!
    GOD BLESS ROSS!

  21. adam on January 2nd, 2008

    Nice reminder Skip, I did vote for Ross Perot, his spoken manner alone proved to be honest….

  22. natasha on January 2nd, 2008

    How can you fail to see who the left/right gatekeeper is though?

    All of the media publicity about Fox excluding Ron Paul, and there is plenty of it, is just meant to make more people watch him on Fox when he is admitted. This is some very clever marketing strategy. Ron Paul is not what he seems, and this couldn’t be more obvious.

    Everybody is in debt up to their eyeballs. Mortgage foreclosures are at an all time high, and yet Ron Paul’s “grass roots” supporters are throwing money at his already overfunded campaign? Average grass roots people are broke ‘and’ in debt. The money is coming form somewhere else then. The real reason Ron Paul has more money, than all the other candidates combined, is because the wealthy elite and the BIG CORPORATIONS are supporting him, and this too couldn’t be more obvious.

    Ron Paul is not only getting plenty of media coverage, he is getting more ‘good publicity’ than all of the other candidates. All the other candidates are getting is the same old media coverage, that everybody is sick to death of, including all their squabbling that only turns everyone off.

    What does supposedly “excluded” Ron Paul get? He gets a massive ‘negative sell’ international media campaign, of the same kind that keeps kids buying cigarettes despite all the anti smoking negative publicity, because that is how negative sell works.

    If you forbid anything and talk day and night about how forbidden it is, then everybody, especially young people, want it all the more. It is the very machine Ron Paul is supposedly targeted against, that is working to sweep him into office, and this too couldn’t be more obvious. In fact it is just too obvious for most people to see. That is how hiding in plain sight works.

  23. beecham on January 2nd, 2008

    This article is absurd. Nader has already said he thinks the best candidates are Kucinich and Gravel. And he didn’t take the 2000 election from Gore. The Supreme Court did that. I am very tired of Nader bashing.

  24. Rob on January 2nd, 2008

    Well if Ron Paul is backed by the same people as all of the other candidates then let me be frank but if even hoping there’s still some legitimate way of regaining law and order is that far fetched and America is fucked! We’ll see the Union come apart a piece at a time and the world will slide into a new dark age! It will be a wonderful spasm of violence and chaos unlike the world has yet seen! Get ready! Go on right now and hide under your bed because Ron Paul is the antichrist, the wolf in sheep’s clothing…the Senator Palpatine? The conspirator? For God’s sake! Is nothing sacred? Is nothing real? Why do we even get up in the morning? Why don’t we just say since we’re fucked anyways we should just all get up tomorrow and do the NWO a favor and kill ourselves!
    Or we could stand and fight for something, have hope and believe that there still is good in the world and that good is the triumph over evil, and that that’s how the story of humanity unfolds. America is the Great Republic of the Ages and there are those who shall resist! And we will wait until the one true enemy reveals themselves and the final battle of Earth is underway!

  25. Barb Clark on January 3rd, 2008

    Speaking of spying. I think you need to look into the National Health Intelligence Network (NHIN). Look at Senator Ted Kennedy’s introduction of Senate Bill 1693. This is a dangerous bill and will establish data sharing and data mining technology. This means that your private confidential medical records will be reviewed by credit bureaus, banks, government agencies, etc. Hey dummies, wake up! See www.BarbClark.org

  26. Mick on January 3rd, 2008

    Reverse psychology to get Ron Paul elected? What a deranged comment. I have seen the Ron Paul supporters out on the streets here in my own city, blacks,whites, asians men, women, out on the streets with signs and flyers and everything else. Is it so hard to believe that people are willing to put their debts/responsibilities aside to throw down with something truly good and bigger than themselves? You are the deluded one. God Bless all the intelligent Americans out there who are throwing their hard-earned money into the campaign of Ron Paul, you are true patriots. Where is the grassroots support for the other candidates? My local Ron Paul meetup group in the little town I live in has over 200 members and events several times a week. Guiliani’s meetup group has 5 people. Hillary’s has 14. Huckabee’s has 20. (probably all Baptist too)Natasha your comments are so ignorant, it is laughable.

  27. Tim on January 3rd, 2008

    Ron Paul supporters are not backed by the New World Order……They are backed
    by real americans who can see through the other new world order presidential
    candidates except for Gravel, Paul and Kucinich. Beware of Clinton, Obama,
    Edwards,Biden, Dodd, Guiliani, Huckabee, Romney and McCain. They are ALL
    NEW WORLD ORDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! American voters are soooooo stupid.

  28. John Mascaro on January 10th, 2008

    This comment is time sensitive: Vote Now 11PM ET/10PM CT Send Text Message to 36288 and text should say: R4 to vote for Ron Paul Post Fox News SC Debate

  29. Darth Chaos on April 16th, 2008

    I meant CSRL instead of CSRI. CSRL stands for Center for the Study of Responsive Law.

    “To suggest that Nader is a ’shill’ for the global elites to destroy America’s sovereignty is beyond paranoid… it is beyond delusional.”

    Bob, Nader sold out to the Rockefellers WAY back in the 1960s. The only way Nader can prove that he’s not a shill would be if he denounced the Rockefellers themselves AND every organization he started up with Rockefeller Foundation money. Until then, he’s a shill