what is important here is not what they are doing so much, its that it sets a dangerous pretense for children under age 18 being able to sign contracts that they are legally bound to uphold and that is a very dangerous thing for liberty our civil rights as a whole and general freedom!

Who knows what kind of other garbage may be tacked on later on. What happens when a district creates a policy where you must be vaccinated on your way from math class to gym class, or you must take a certain pill to participate in psychology? It’s not a far stretch once you open the door with no resistance!

There are bigger problems than alcohol for high school students. That is just what kids do at this age they experiment with different things. We all have tried it whether it was one time or more than one and parents and grandparents can’t deny it. Even our highest respected leaders have done the same thing, so why is it such a big deal now. I think the government is trying to shield our youths eyes by saying “Oh its for your own safety” but exactly they just want control over us. We can go and join the military and kill people at the age of 18 but we can’t drink alcohol. What kind of society do we live in when kids can risk their lives for our country, if thats what you wanna call it, but can go out and have a few beers and relax. I think that is major bs, especially when we got students making a living by selling drugs to follow students and teachers while at school. What a great government we have. We’ll punish students for drinking but we’ll let the president of the united states snort some coke and no one says anything way to go american politicians.

Cold medications and mouthwashes do have alcohol in them and if you’ve just used one before the breathalyzer, the reading comes back very high, as demonstrated in our HS health class. HOWEVER, they then wait a few minutes and retake the test. Wherein the result come back below the legal level for minors. (Under the age of 21, we are allowed to have up to a .02 for things like communion.)

The majority of those students will have driver’s licenses, the possession of a driver’s license, at least in this state, allows the law to request breathalyzer tests and holds you responsible if you refuse when pulled over. A lot of people would debate whether a child under eighteen is able to be held responsible for a contract. We’re not talking twelve year-olds. We’re talking fourteen to seventeen year-olds. They read the contract, they understood it, and they signed it. While legally that may be under debate, it’s a position that should change. That’s as bad as the people who say that teenagers can’t be tried as adults for murder. At fourteen, doesn’t the average citizen understand the consequences which await them for killing another? They also understand the contracts. Let them sign if they will.

Children signing ‘legal documents’ sets a legal precedent also; criminal and civil courts could universally lower prosecution ages from 18 to say 14. It’s not impossible-minors have been ‘tried’ as adults depending upon the ‘viciousness’ of their crime-however, prosecutors had to certify and petition the court for that change. Oh, by the way, in NJ, pre-school and daycare aged children MUST be vaccinated in order to attend school.

goqdpnhbr djxewt sakz bzhjcyxe oeyjmrl hrvsofxd wpqza

msrkh
http://www.gratisweb.com/airline10/continental continental airline tickets

rfop qjfvlet zwykeqm
http://1airline2008.cataloghos.....stairfare1 the cheapest airfare

vujtrek arcdh rljqgpa
http://medlem.spray.se/certifi.....inderalwww inderal 10mg

dqktw gxoszie fywpdqh qumkn
http://medlem.spray.se/certificatedshopp/hytrin hytrin prostate