I have been invloved in three (3) civil rights lawsuits under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Ron Paul is correct. Anyone who will research the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1869 and Amendment XIV of the U.S. Constitution will discover that the Republican Congress needed an invisible militia to occupy the South. This had nothing to do with “civil rights”.

A standing Union Army would be too expensive in the South. So, Congress (and this is well documented) decided that providing Civil Rights to freed slaves would be the best method to empower these slaves to act as the eyes and ears of Washington, D.C. and perform civilian militia surviellance of the former enemy states. The idea for Civil Rights, as articulated by federal law, was not the personal freedom of rights for freed slaves, but freedom to file federal lawsuits to keep the former enemy states in check.

All this type of federal empowerment has done is to put black citizens in jeopardy when they were foolish enough (like me) to think that they could make application of civil rights laws to protect their own civil rights in federal court. The federal government only steps in when there is an opportunity to expand federal police powers.

I point to 28 USC 1443(2), which allows a citizen to remove a state charge to federal court only if the citizen is assiting a federal officer in enforcing a civil rights law. See the connection with federal enforcement?

This truth isn’t pretty; but, Americans want American Idol sugar coated answers. Sorry folks, but this is the basis of civil rights. Ron Paul is correct in saying the federal government has never really done anything to enforce personal civil rights.

The Federal government wants to enforce pre-emptive federalism (DEA smashing in medical marijuana clinics) and many times using a civil rights pre-text to justify their expansion of federal police powers.

www.BarbClark.org

Ron Paul is not a racist, his primary goal and solution is state sovereignty, the only legal interpretation of our Constitution. The federal government unconstitutionally stole sovereignty from the states using the blacks during the Civil War. Abraham Lincoln acted in military and economic aggression against the South combining federal wealth and power with the northern industrialists and capitalists. This is a formula they never quit using and this corruption is quite evident today.

Didn’t the people responsible for peddling the racism get fired from the publication? Did the editors of that publication ever fully brief Dr.Paul on the incident at the time? Did those editors bare any responsibility? I heard Paul allude that there was a shakeup in that publication as a result of those printings, and I have heard before that the writer was fired. I want to know more about it. Kurt? Can you work on that?

As for the accusation of anti-semitism.. I think it is pretty silly to conclude that Paul is an anti-semite because he wants to stop funding a nation with whom we have no mutual defense treaties. And I don’t think being critical of a foreign policy has anything to do with religious hatred anyway.. I suppose he’s anti-muslim as well then since he also wants to stop funding Arab states. Silly, knee-jerk accusation.

Finally, as a gay man, I don’t find anything written there to be anti-gay. I read something inferring that AIDS was a homosexual cover-up, and I happen to agree. Anyone who is researched in the field knows that there is strong evidence which indicates that AIDS is an American engineered bio-weapon. I could go deeply into detail bit for now, Tuskegee Experiment anyone? I also read an observation about the “party” lifestyle of gay men in the 70’s in San Francisco. Again, true, and I can tell you that it is still true in a large degree. We gays are a party crowd in general. We are loud and proud and we burn bright and die young in a blast of fashion and rainbow colors. Of course, as an individualist I can’t say this is true for everyone. But also as an individualist and a gay man, I can say that it was true for me. The reasons for this are many, ranging from social oppression and the resulting reactionary overtness, to witnessing all of our friends get sick and die, thus bringing home our own mortality. Again, I could into it but now is not the time.

All I will say further is this. Things are not always how they appear, and while I encourage everyone to ask questions and demand answers, I would also ask that you accept those answers when they are reasonable. Do not let this establishment shock you back in line. We all knew the smears would get bad, but here’s the thing about Paul. This is as bad as it gets, and he didn’t even write that nonsense… lol. Heads up folks, we are winning.

I really get sick and tired of the overuse (and misuse) of the word racist. If I accuse you of being racist, what I’m saying to you is that you think/feel/believe that your race is superior to others. I may also be accusing you of acts (or behaviors) that intentionaly opress someone of another race based on the color of their skin. If I accuse you of being prejudice, I’m saying the you prejudge someone based on your opinion of how that someone looks/acts/believes etc.

The term racist (or racism) is wildly thrown around in today’s culture and in reality, there is rarely any basis for using such a term. The term reverse-racism is a joke, since it implies that racism generally flows in one direction. Racism is racism. One could say that reverse racism is the mirror image of racism, giving it positive connotations.

That being said, the author of this Ron Paul hit piece is making a weak attempt at accusing him of racism. In fact, he is prejudging Ron Paul for statements (which he admits are irrelevent) and a political belief system that appears to be gathering a head of steam amongst many Americans. In this sense, as the author is making innaccurate statements by calling Ron Paul and his supporters ‘racist’, he is incriminating himself as being fundamentally prejudice against one man and his support group. He does this with ‘power’ terminology that in effect stakes a claim to his own superiority over Ron Paul and anyone that supports him.

Hx, and what’s disgusting is not only would a government create such an abomination, but release it on their own public. Then, to add insult to injury say that anyone mentions this conspiracy is a nutjob racist or homophobic. It’s real sick.

Note the sneaky omission of the word ‘federal’ just prior to each mention of ‘government’. Just reread and insert federal right before government and his whole arguement falls apart. Ron Paul doesn’t want to hamper local or state governments, just constitutionally limit the federal government.

You are not normal, you have no basis of knowledge yet you ramble on seemingly for your own personal narcissism. You don’t know Dr. Paul on a personal level and have no real evidence to support the nonsense you espouse. Yet you fill an entire page with twisted theories in an attempt to cloud the fact that you simple don’t have a personal knowledge as to the character of Dr. Ron Paul on the issue of racism. You are a hack plain and simple and if you were bring this argument into a court of law armed only with your delusional rantings you are quite possibly going to be incarcerated for a psychological evaluation as the courts often do for crazy people such as you seem to be.
Good day sir!

Slavery is an Abonmination onto the World of Man kind. To Force another to work(Some slaves were actually paid wages and some still are), In this Worlds history. To attain their livelyhoods.

If People would just research slavery and the Civil War. They’ll find that the North had slaves of their own. Even during and up to the end of the Civil War!
The Reason the South fought wasn’t BECAUSE of Slavery! It was becuase the US Constitutional Law, that granted states their own sovereignty to make Laws under the US Constitution & Bill of Rights, under a common Law. Gods Laws! Was put into Jeopardy!
State Sovereignty was the real Civil War issue, not Slavery!
You really have to understand How Americ became its own nation From International Laws of those times to understand why the Civil War enslaved ALL Men to Government. Which continues to evolve under that Evil Perpatrated(A Lie).
Common Law /Constitutional Law was contorted into something else. Not Gods law. All Men were finding out why Slavery wasn’t Morally right or cost effectivelly/Fair.
Why is it the USA was the Only country in the World. That had a Civil War to figure this Out? Because Slavery wasn’t the real issue of thee Civil War
Destruction of the Bill of Right and US Constitution WAS!
Our Founding Fathers Stated ” ALL Men are created equal”. And the fight to make that a US Colony reality was fought for up until the Civil War. Then the WINNER Just instituted a Grand scheme onto the entire nation by the Wealthy/Greedy. And it is Perpetuated into todays society by the lies of racism. Some Men just Hate others because they are different than them or their>>> CULTURE/tribe

We are all flawed. Stop manefesting Your flaws, onto the World around You and into other peoples lives. There’s Just some ideas That really work if We can get Evil out of those systems.
But You see? Someone always thinks they can get Power somehow and tell others how they’ll live their lives.Because they think they have a better way.
The US Constitution was the Perfect Form/yet it just took people to subvert it.
That’s why every castle buildt falls down………

Kurt, great rebuttal. Commenters, great stuff, which is why this site will become number one to a lot of people. As a White Racist, but getting better, it takes a lifetime of learning, or should I say unlearning what we were taught when young. Having went to a ALL white school, with ALL white teachers,and growing up in a ALL white neighborhood, for my first 6 grades, gives me a take on things where race was not pointed at. When race is not the easy thing by which to compare one another too, there then lies the crux of what we call racist. When race is not a factor, we then differentiate by, size, shape, hair color, eye color, glasses, haircut, clothes, backround, family members, ect. In short, everything, and anything. How far have I come? Before I was a ” Ron Paul Republican “, I was a ” Alan Keyes Republican”. In a fairly All white city called Livonia, Michigan to hear Alan speak one time, imagine my surprise in seeing almost 100% of the people attending were WHITE! At thirty, an forty something I was still naive enough to think I would be probably the only WHITE person there. I had to ask a Black co-worker the next day why there were only a few Black families there. Had he heard of Alan Keyes, and did he not feel excited that a Black man was getting so much White support? In a round about way he pointed out that most Blacks thought Alan was “White”. Cliff pointed out that Blacks had been poisoned by the destruction of the Black families, and by the way Government aid was handed out. That dependency upon the aid would cause them not to support someone that would try to reduce that. I did not see Alan as Black. I heard his idea’s, and that is what is important. I would enjoy it if Ron Paul asked Alan Keyes to be his running mate. Or Vice Versa. How far have I come? A lifetime. How much further must I go? Lifetimes.

Who’s Earl Hutchinson? Never heard of him. Is he, yet another, self-appointed black “leader” who’s job it is to think for all of us?

S Wolf.

Ron Paul is not a racist. Don’t you realize all these namby-pamby groups that keep whites, blacks, and mexicans at each other’s throats are founded and funded by the said groups to bring in money and to keep our attention off the REAL problem? Which is what our murdering, lying, evil, satanic, homo pedophilia goverment is doing and what they have planned for all of us. I suggest you sit down read every interview Alex Jones’ has, watch all his documentaries and hear every daily show and you will soon get the picture that race is the least of our issue. After you watch his documentaries (Endgame is a good one to watch first, or Terrorstorm or 9-11 the road to tyranny) and then make copies and pass them out so others will know. They ARE going for a one-world governent, a slave nation and elminating the over-population of the world. I gurantee YOU won’t be one lucky to live like I won’t be either. Look up fema camps while your at it and see that they do have places for us to go who complain about the New World Order. They are moving along very fast to get this North American Union done and that is a major chess piece for a global government. Ron Paul is the only on who can try and stop these trolls legally. It will get ugly if he isn’t put into office. The people are tired.

Dia, and others, why do you think I link my name with my comments to my blog?! Clearly you haven’t clicked on it and read my most “recent” article (”old”, but I keep updating it), and haven’t read very many of my comments in context; otherwise, you would know that I already know all that you just wrote, and that I agree with you wholeheartedly, except perhaps about Ron Paul. And in the “long” comment I made above, I didn’t even call Dr. Paul a racist! What’s up?

I didn’t even say that Kurt’s definitely a racist. Anyway, please read my blog and more of my comments to realize that why I stand as I do on the issue of racism and not trusting politicians before you, or anyone else, jumps to so many wrong conclusions about me. Why is it people can’t understand a well written comment like I wrote above, where I explained myself very succinctly, without twisting my words around and jumping to conclusion?!

Also, I HAVE watched all three of the documentaries you named above, and I believe that they’re all excellent. Don’t get me wrong, I do still applaud Alex Jones’ excellent documentary abilities and truth-telling; but, as I’ve more than sufficiently explained in other comments, in other threads, I won’t worship people like many of you Alex Jones fan worship him; and I won’t praise someone who is a hypocrite, fake “Christian” and a hater!!

If you and people like yourself hate me for that, so be it. I am not going to compromise my principles and conscience by catering to your’s or anyone else’s beliefs, whether about some thing or some one, to fit in with “you” and “get along”. I tell it like it is with no compromise(s), and that’s the way it’s always going to remain because I don’t have a hateful, counterfeit-”Christian” or truly hypocritical bone in my body.

Do I have to spell everything out in every comment?! I am COMPLETELY against the NWO and EVERYTHING Jones and Company, Kurt Nimmo and many others stand up against in their documentaries, articles, protests, etc. But I don’t trust ANYONE. You and others may think that’s very sad and/or wrong; but I’m highly discerning, and when peoples’ “fruits” definitely prove them to be what Alex’s have proven him to be, as stated above, I have to tell it like it is about it.

Why do I continue to promote Jones’ videos, Nimmo’s articles, etc.? Because, though I adamantly disagree with them on certain points, as stated above and previously, I still support what they are 100% right-on about! I realize NO ONE is probably going to be 100% right-on about all things; but if you and others expect me to ignore the serious things they’re wrong on, and/or to support them 100% without criticism when they’re wrong, it ain’t ever gonna happen.

You think that’s contradictive and/or hypocritical? That I should be 100% for them or completely against them, or just have nothing to do with them, without criticizing them, because of that which I find unacceptable? Sure, I could do that, but I don’t believe that would be a responsible thing to do, even though I don’t trust them completely, anymore than I trust anyone completely, other than God the Father, the Lord Jesus the Christ, and the Holy Spirit.

Now, if I found Jones and Company to contradict themselves, not truly, fully and completely stand against the things we need to AND MUST completely stand against, and/or I found out for sure that they’re secretly really controlled opposition and/or working for the evil powers that be, I WOULD have nothing more to do with them whatsoever, would not promote their articles and/or documentaries, and wouldn’t support them in any fashion. But, as long as they continue to be 90 to 98% right-on, I will continue to stand by what they stand by that’s 100%.

Oh, and before I forget, I am beginning to believe that perhaps Congressman Paul isn’t a racist, seeing as I HAVE reviewed, and/or am reviewing, the available evidence to the contrary; but, regardless, I still won’t trust him; because, as I’ve made abundantly clear, he’s a career physician, Congressman and politician, and I won’t EVER trust ANY such people EVER again! He may be our best secular hope; but I, again, don’t put my trust in people AT ALL!

I truly wish that Paul had a true chance of getting into the “(Black) House” and being able to effect the change(s) that Truly need to be effected; but, even if by some miracle he did get in, I don’t trust that things would even be within his power to be able to effect those changes this late in the game. Defeatest? Too pessimistic or cynical? I don’t think so, and I have to follow my conscience as I believe God is leading me. People are NOT the answer!

S Wolf, your comments are well made, but let’s face it - someone has to be put into the White House. We can’t exactly scrap the whole idea of centralized government in just over 11 months. And it’s pretty certain that our Lord won’t be a candidate any time soon (and who can blame him with this mess we’ve made of things). So before we throw our hands in the air, what are we going to do? Are we just going to sit and wait for rapture?

The African populations of North America, are unhappy and antisocial citizens, whose ancestors were granted refuge in North America in the eighteenth century.

Witness the testimony of the King of Dahomey who ruled much of the Congo basin, who assumed the throne of that nation at age eighteen in about 1820, and who died the same day as Queen Victoria in 1900. Making him one of the longest ruling monarchs in history. The only interview he ever granted was to Henry Morton Stanley in about 1870, he assured Stanley that every person over four years of age within the entire Congo basin, regularly ate human flesh. Social infractions of any kind, hooliganism or indeed casting ones eyes upon the King guaranteed a one way trip to the town butcher. The victims were auctioned in the marketplaces a piece at a time, thus a customer would purchase a leg for instance, or a hand or the liver, and would receive a token. Then when the whole body was sold, the victim would be dispatched and the tokens exchanged for his body parts.

It was the refugees from cannibalism that made up the bulk of African immigration into America. All a ship had to do was anchor anywhere in the Congo delta, and they would swarm aboard, a situation that continues to this day.

When a fancy was to hit the block foreigners attended the auctions, for in an act of mercy the King had decreed that should a foreign purchaser outbid everyone else, and guarantee that the felon was definitely, under pain of immediate death going to be leaving the country permanently. Those who wanted to could go to the butchers market and bid.

J, first of all, I don’t believe in the rapture as you appear to. Biblically, all the rapture means is the second coming of Jesus the Christ in the clouds of heaven (the atmosphere), separating the wheat from the tares (the True Christians from the evildoers), having the former join him in the sky, laying all of the wicked in their graves, including those who were just resurrected in the first resurrection to witness the second coming, for a thousand years until the second resurrection and the judgment of the wicked, and taking the righteous home to heaven for the first judgment, of the righteous, and for that thousand years. That is ALL it means about “one will be taken, and the other left”; and there is NO special “rapture” where the True Christians are just going to disappear.

Secondly, no, we don’t just “throw our hands in the air (give up)” and/or “just sit and wait” for the second coming without doing anything, and I am NOT doing nothing; but voting for a finite, errant, sinful person to be my earthly “savior”, even only on a temporal, secular level, is completely out. I have had enough sin in my own life to answer for, than to also add to it responsibility for whatever evils that person commits while in office. We are ALL going to be held COMPLETELY accountable for ALL of the blood and/or other evils we have on our hands, even if some of them are due to someone else we voted for committing them, and not us directly. I will not have ANY of those evils on my hands.

Thirdly, if those who are not “convicted” as I am per the previous point(s), can vote for such a man or woman if they believe, however falsely, that they will supposedly not be held responsible for whatever evils that person commits while in office, then “more power to them” so to speak. So, I am not telling everyone not to vote for Ron Paul, although I would, if asked, recommend against it, or explain as I have here that I don’t trust him, explain what I said above, and explain that I would not, and/or will not, vote for him myself. Everyone has free will to make up their own minds, and I don’t try to coerce the making up of their minds; thus, if they believe they can conscientiously vote for a person, so be it.

Racist!? Pure propaganda shit!
He is just a conservative politican and the good thing is he is not one of those corruptionist.
It’s ridiculous to hear that in the media!